Follow us on social media for latest updates
Telegram - @FzGroup | Instagram - @FzMovie | Twitter - @FzGroup
Wes really out done himself! (by CelesteChere) |
The savage murders appear to be piling up just when Sydney Prescott begins to pull the knots in her life loose again and move on. Along with the survivors of the first Scream, David Arrquette, Neve Campbell, Courtney Cox, and Jamie Kennedy show an amazing performance in this Hip-thriller and sequle to "Scream" Also with another new hip cast such as Jerry O'Connel, Eleas Neal, Timothy Olyphant, Jada Pinkett, Omar Epps, and last but not least Sarah Michelle Gellar!The murders take place in a copycat mode of names of the victims from the first "Scream" Such as Maurreen <more> |
The Best 'Scream' Movie (by james-clarke797-1) |
I was a huge fan of the scream series i first watched scream when i was 9! and i have to say that this is the best by far. I like both of the other movies, but with 'SCR3AM' i found that it was more funny than scary Especially Sarahs Death, why would you hide between scream costumes! and with the first scream, i know its a classic but lets face it, it isn't very scary any more, like Halloween and nightmare on elm street. What i found so scary about this movie is that you can never guess who is going to be killed next, for example, who thought that out of the main movie, Sarah <more> |
It was indeed better then part 1 (by djgold_1999) |
Yes, it's true that original movies, like part 1 of any movie or series is claimed to be the "best", just because it kicked off everything.Well if that's so true? Then howcome Austin Powers The Spy Who Shagged Me, was 10 times better then the first part and made more money? I can't speak about this movie, on the the money part. Is it better then part 1, much much better. Non-stop action and killing. Story was good and had twists. The first 1, was more like an 80's slasher flick. It really didn't have much of a moral, it did have you wanting to ask more <more> |
Incredibly surpassing sequel (by Dragoneyed363) |
After the Scream phenomenon, it was only natural that a sequel was in the works. While most slasher sequels tend to be a let down and not live up to their first by having a ridiculous premise or not having the needed characters, Scream 2 is entirely different. This sequel was excellent, and lived up to the first Scream perfectly, when I did not think it would on first viewing. I mean, I was expecting it to be good, but not as good as it was. It's premise was wonderful, and the characters are amazing, because it has all the characters, that aren't already victims, from the first and <more> |
Better than the first! (by Xophianic) |
I really enjoyed SCREAM because I thought it was a very original horror movie. I liked SCREAM 2 for the same reason. The story line is pretty much the same as in SCREAM, but I thought the acting, characters, and death scenes were all better.Sidney Prescott Neve Campbell has gone off to college to become and actress. Now that she has left her past behind her, she is doing better. She has a new best friend/roommate named Hallie Elise Neal , a new boyfriend and a new life. But when somebody starts killing people in the same style of the killer, Sidney finds out that her past has come back to <more> |
A sequel that lives up to the original (by iknowotudidlastsumme-1) |
I have always loved scream and believe that it is one of the greatest movies i will watch for a while.Scream 2 is another death in the beginning and guess throughout, while others have died there are more people around Sidney this time which leaves even more suspects for Sid and us to suspect and wonder just how save she really is.I found the acting on this one to be well above average and i can't really fault anyone's acting and i have to admit that i really do like Sarah Michelle gellar and i found her to be an amazing little actress in this one as well.The plot hasn't run thin <more> |
Flawles but yet enjoyable horror slasher sequel flick (by ivo-cobra8) |
Scream 2 is flawless but enjoyable sequel it is not better than the first one but much way better than part 4. Wes Craven and Kevin Williamson does return for this sequel but still I enjoy the third one much way more. The second sequel was good little different mixed with action and humor, but it wasn't that scary to me. It is really a step down from the first film. I have a lot of problems with this film. The bad: The writer Kevin Williamson copied the first film why would they copy the first film? I don't get it. The film looks like the same as the first movie, first the name of the <more> |
Better than the original (by emperor_bender) |
Dare me to say it? ...THIS MOVIE WAS BETTER THAN THE ORIGINAL! Ha! There goes my "useful comment" rating!Not many movies beat their originals, especially in the horror genre. However, Scream 2 proved them wrong.Sidney has gone to college and moved on with her life after the events of Scream. However, the murders and famous "ghostface killer" have followed too. Sidney, Dewey, Gale, Randy, and Cotton all return from the first film. But we also get an interesting new group of people: Hallie, Derek, Mickey, Cici, and Debbie the reporter, who is actually more annoying than <more> |
Wonderful sequel that is the perfect bedfellow for the first film. (by Spikeopath) |
I'm just not buying into the bad rating for this film, in 1996 Wes Craven's Scream reinvigorated an ailing genre and got fans back into the horror groove. The love for that film, I feel, tends to skew opinions of the second instalment in what became the Scream foursome, Scream 2 seams perfectly from its starting point to up the daring ante, and plonk tongue even further into its cheek in the process.Sidney Prescott has moved on from the horrendous murders in Woodsboro and is at college getting on with her life, but the peace and hope for a bright future is quickly shattered because <more> |